Contemporary rationale for banning certain classes in DS 3E

The link to templar, under the word “here”, also works for me. As long as you found it anyway, no problem.

Right. I came up with some similar things, but they work with the base class. For example, a psionic auditor templar would take this feat.

Mentat Templar [General]

You make yourself useful to the templarate by using your psionic powers. Your levels in psionic manifesting classes do not hinder your advancement within the templarate.

Prerequisites: Secular aptitude. Mitigate corruption.

Benefit: Your levels in psionic manifesting classes stack with your templar class levels for purposes of determining secular aptitude and mitigate corruption. In addition, if your combined class levels of psionic manifesting classes and templar should reach 14th level, you gain the benefits of the High Templar (Ex) class feature.

So they’d be templars, possibly with as little as one level in the templar class. They’d maintain the social meat and potatoes of the templar class, that is secular authority, ability to be corrupt, and progression up the hierarchy.

Right again. I think that different templar types are better handled with feats or ACFs. The way I’ve done it over in the thread I linked there is a lot of potential for variety, and no templar will be a cookie cutter copy of another.